Author’s information (optional)
Url Link
The hyperlink to my paper’s website.
Methods
Methods:
- Paste quoted text from the Methods section of the article on the next line. Do not include quotation marks or a bullet mark:
Mental Health. Mental health was measured with the short-form twelve item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ), a self-report instrument used to aid diagnosis of disorders such as anxiety and depression. Respondents report how they have felt in the “past few weeks” compared to “usual” for six positive mood states, such as being able to concentrate and make decisions, and six negative mood states, such as feeling under strain and lacking confidence. The dependent variable is GHQ Score, where item responses indicative of distress score 1, and responses indicative of limited or no distress score 0, and these are summed to give a scale score between 0 and 12. Scale scores were reverse coded in the analysis (i.e., Inverse GHQ) so that higher scores represented better mental health.
- Write your translation on the next line:
Mental Health was measured using the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) that surveys participants about their mood, stress, and confidence. Participants self-report how they have felt over the past few weeks compared to usual. There are six positive mood states and six negative mood states. For the GHQ, the participants would add a score of 1 for each item they where they felt distress, and they would get a score of 0 for low or no distress. At the end they would have a score between 0-12 measuring their level of stress. For this study, the researchers reverse-coded the scores so that higher numbers mean better mental health.
Introduction
Introduction:
- Paste quoted text from the Introduction of the article on the next line. Do not include quotation marks:
First, there may be initial improvement in mental health, followed by a decrease in benefits as individuals adapt to their new greener surroundings and the novelty wears off — an adaptation hypothesis. Under this possibility the higher overall average is due only to an increase in the first couple of years. Alternatively, there may be little initial benefit from moving because, for instance, it takes time to get to know where local parks are and to begin to use them. Only as these new opportunities are taken up does mental health improve gradually — a sensitisation hypothesis. In this case the higher overall average is only due to later years. Finally, mental health may improve directly following a move to a greener area and remain at a similar heightened level thereafter — an immediately shifting baseline hypothesis.
-
Write your translation on the next line:
In this study, the same people are followed over several years in the UK to track what happens when someone moves to a greener neighbourhood. The researchers want to find out how mental health changes over time after a move and whether these changes follow one of three patterns:
Adaptation: mental health improves at first, but the benefits are temporary as people settle into their new environment.
Sensitisation: mental health improves gradually as people slowly discover and start using the green spaces.
Shifting Baseline: mental health improves quickly after moving and stays at the higher level.
Results
Results:
- Paste quoted text from the Results section in the article on the next line. Do not include quotation marks:
Descriptives. There were some differences in the two groups of movers (Tables 1 and 2). For instance, on average, movers to greener areas were slightly older at T−2(M = 38.87; SD = 15.16) than movers to less green areas (M = 37.28, SD = 15.15), more likely to be married (74.07% vs 62.55%), more likely to be retired (10.61% vs 8.51%), less likely to live in a detached house (10.77% vs 22.77%), and more likely to be noncommuters (29.97% vs 25.74%). Movers to greener areas, who were currently living in less green areas, also had lower mean (inverse) GHQ scores at T−2 (9.78) than movers to less green areas, who were currently living in more green areas, (10.15).
- Write your translation on the next line:
Before moving, people who relocated to greener areas were slightly older, more likely to be married or retired, land ess likely to commute or to live in detached houses. People moving to greener areas who were currently living in less green areas, also had slightly worse mental health scores compared to those who moved to less green areas after living in more green spaces.
Discussion
Discussion:
- Paste quoted text from the Discussion section of the article on the next line. Do not include quotation marks:
An important example of the limitations of how constructs are operationalised in this work is the fact that cross-sectional environmental Science & Technology Article estimates of area level factors (at 2005) were distributed to all waves of data (1991−2008), with no correction for changes within areas over time. We assume this to have very limited impact on our estimations, since comparative differences in environmental and socio-demographic aspects of a residential area at different times are assumed to be slight in comparison to those between different residential areas at the same, or different, times. We were also unable to examine mechanisms that might explain how green space could improve mental well-being by, for instance, encouraging greater levels of physical activity or promoting better neighbourhood relations.
- Write your translation on the next line:
Another limitation was that the data about neighbourhood green space came from a single year (2005) and were applied to all other years, meaning they couldn’t account for how neighbourhoods might have changed over time. It also assumed that everyone in a neighbourhood experienced the same amount of green space, when some people may live live closer to parks and spend more time outside than others. The study also couldn’t directly determine why green space improves mental health, for example it could be due to more exercise, social connection, or less noise.
Future Directions
Future Directions
- What future research should follow up on this work?
The researchers recommend that future studies use larger samples from the UK’s recently completed Understanding Society panel, explore the importance of mover motivations, and track people for longer periods to better understand the relationship between green space, life changes, and mental health.
Difficult Material
Difficult Material:
- What did you not understand about this paper that someone else may be able to help you with? Or, if you understood everything, what did you find most challenging to understand?
It’s been a while since I’ve had to read a research paper in detail, so it took me some time to get through it. I understand the paper fully, but I find it difficult to stay focused because of the dense, technical language. Math and statistics are challenging for me, so when I get to the results section, I have to make an effort not to skim and instead really try to absorb the information.
BIOL 1593 – Assignment 2 Worksheet
Your Name: Shaeba Santhosh
URL link:
> Paste the hyperlink to the website containing the original posting about the paper – NOT to the scientific paper itself (either the public posting webpage, or the Moodle forum webpage):
https://moodle.tru.ca/mod/forum/discuss.php?d=1125492
Additional Translation:
> From which section of the paper is this passage?
Discussion
> Paste quoted text on the next line. Do not include quotation marks or a bullet mark:
This implies that initial benefits to mental health from urban greening might be maximized when developments are accompanied by information campaigns, and health or lifestyle promotion work. Finally, the impact might be immediate and sustained, and result in a relatively rapid shift in baseline mental health after a move (i.e., the shifting baseline hypothesis).
> Write your translation on the next line:
According to the results from the study, we can understand that if information awareness is provided to the participants by promoting health and lifestyle, through forms such as campaigns, the benefits to mental health due to urban greening can be greater. It also reveals that bringing awareness through information generates a prolonged and more immediate impact, as well as a quicker shift in baseline mental health directly after a move.
Additional Future Directions:
> What future research do you think should follow up on this work?
An example of future research can be to study if physical activity, neighborhood interactions, and other outdoor opportunities facilitated by being in greener spaces, affects mental health to a larger extent. Is mental health improved just by the visual/ sensory accessibility to greener areas, or is it related to aforementioned benefits?
Difficult Material (from original poster or subsequent student):
> What did the previous poster state was difficult to understand? (please copy and paste their statement here):
It’s been a while since I’ve had to read a research paper in detail, so it took me some time to get through it. I understand the paper fully, but I find it difficult to stay focused because of the dense, technical language. Math and statistics are challenging for me, so when I get to the results section, I have to make an effort not to skim and instead really try to absorb the information.
> Please try to explain the difficult materials to the original poster, as best as you can. (This is where you can help them understand what they found difficult.)
Interpreting the results section of research papers can indeed be a difficult task. Breaking it down into smaller sections and using the discussion section to help make sense of the statistics is a tip I like to implement. Clearly identifying the variables in the study can also help guide the understanding of results. It’s normal to have to read over the same section multiple times!
New Difficult Material (according to you):
> What did you not understand about this paper, that someone else can help with? If you understood everything, then what did you find most challenging to understand?
Understanding the regression analysis in Figure 2 was difficult for me. I don’t think I interpreted each component of the graphs accurately, although the results section helped a bit. Also the GHQ formula in the methods section involving several variables was new and a bit challenging.