Author’s information (optional)
Url Link
The hyperlink to my paper’s website.
Methods
How does the literature define nature? What are the characteristics of the nature intervention? What are the mental health and well-being outcomes being measured? What does the evidence show with regard to how nature affects the mental health and well-being of children and adolescents?
This research paper looks to examine a wide array of scholarly papers to determine whether or not nature has a positive effect on the mental health of our younger populations. To identify results, this research paper must also look at what characteristics define “nature” and what aspects of mental health are affected by said nature or green spaces.
Introduction
Current research suggest nature may be beneficial for children’s brain and cognitive development, as evidenced by three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging and cognitive testing, with specific improvements in working memory and attention. Current research also indicates its beneficial effect on mental health and well-being, including reducing stress, improving attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms, reducing depressive symptoms ad psychological distress and fostering emotional well-being.
Overall, current research shows a vast and positive impact of green space on overall mental health and nature can counteract the negative implications and associations of spending too much time indoors. Child and youth mental health and behaviour is positively affected by time outside.
Results
Nature appears to have a beneficial effect on mental health and well-being with largely significant positive results. In general, the evidence was in support of nature’s beneficial effects on children’s mental health-related outcomes. All ten reviews that focused on both cild and adolescent populations (under -18) supported nature’s beneficial effects on mental health and well-being.
While there are a number of ways youth can be exposed or participate in outdoor activity and green space, it is largely shown that most if not all forms of nature have a strong positive effect on the health and well-being of young populations.
Discussion
In this meta-review we found that ‘nature’ is conceptualized along a continuum into three broad categories: a human-designed environment with natural elements; a human-designed natural environment; and a natural environment. We call this continuum the ‘nature research framework’. Nature ‘interventions’ fall into three key areas – access, exposure, or engagement with nature – with quantity and quality of nature being relevant to all three areas. We judge that in general (i.e. non-clinical) child and adolescent populations, there is sufficient indication of benefit to motivate more high-quality research into the relationship between nature and mental health and well-being.It is important to not simply extrapolate adult findings to the child and adolescent population, as childhood and adolescence may be a particularly sensitive and unique period, whereby nature may have long-lasting effects on mental health across the life-course.
While there is significant evidence of the positive effects of nature on mental health and well-being, further research is needed in this area as the term “nature” is so vast and mental health is so broad. It is also important to note that the effects on children and youth are unique in their importance as they seem to have a particular imprint on mental health that can spread across an individual’s lifetime.
Future Directions
We need to follow up looking at different socioeconomic characteristics as well as the differences between nature found in rural vs nature found in urban settings. Also, what is the minimal “baseline” recommended dosage for nature exposure to receive maximum benefits for children and youth mental health and well-bring.
Difficult Material
To be sincere, I did not lack understanding nor did I find it difficult to understand this research and paper, so I would like to stress the importance of a section that might go unnoticed: the effect of nature on an individuals lifetime continuum. It would seem that exposure to nature in our youth has a lasting and positive effect on life in later years. To put simply, nature can have a positive imprint on our lives that carries through to adulthood. In a world that is narrowing when it comes to being outside and off-screens, it is crucial to understand the importance of nature and green space on our overall mental and physical well-being. Nothing can replace the effects of sun on the body and grass in the toes!
URL link:
Paste the hyperlink to the website containing the original posting about the paper – NOT to the scientific paper itself (either the public posting webpage, or the Moodle forum webpage):
https://moodle.tru.ca/mod/forum/discuss.php?d=1100904
Additional Translation:
From which section of the paper is this passage?
Discussion
Paste quoted text on the next line. Do not include quotation marks or a bullet mark:
This nationwide, population-based study, comprising data from 10,076 subjects, demonstrated that long-term exposure to PM2.5 and PM10 was significantly associated with an increased risk of depression and anxiety.
Write your translation on the next line:
In this study, it is found that people would be more likely to have depression and anxiety with prolonged exposure to PM2.5 and PM10.
Additional Future Directions:
What future research do you think should follow up on this work?
Future research should investigate different methods and applications to reduce air pollutants including PM2.5 and PM10 while deciding if the associated methods could lead to better mental health.
Difficult Material (from original poster or subsequent student):
What did the previous poster state was difficult to understand? (please copy and paste their statement here):
I found the statistical methods (generalized estimation equations and principal component regression) a bit complex. I’m not entirely clear on how the principal component regression breaks down overlapping environmental factors. Someone with stats background could help explain that.
Please try to explain the difficult materials to the original poster, as best as you can. (This is where you can help them understand what they found difficult.)
For generalized estimation equations, it is a method that looks at how something affects a group over time. It also considers that measurements from previous times up to the current ones are connected.
New Difficult Material (according to you):
What did you not understand about this paper, that someone else can help with? If you understood everything, then what did you find most challenging to understand?
I don’t understand the role of covariates in this paper. I find it difficult to differentiate it with confounding variables or mediators. I also find it hard to understand how it is related to the main factors we look at in the paper.